Monday, May 30, 2011

What's really going on?

Latest in Libyan war
       As the civil war in Libya rages on we are left wondering what is really going on?   The facts are unclear, as always, and the stories coming out of the country are contradicting.  Surprised?  Why would you be?  It's obvious, it's business as usual.  In the past few weeks several different stories have been circulating in the press and in Washington.  Let's get caught up shall we!
         The CIVIL WAR in Libya is an ongoing armed conflict being fought between local rebels, those seeking to depose the country's ruler Qaddafi, and Pro-Qaddafi troops and followers.  The situation began as a series of protests which Qaddafi's security services attempted to repress, beginning on 15 February 2011. Quickly, uprising had spread across the country and Qaddafi was struggling to retain control. Qaddafi responded with military force and censorship of media. The situation then escalated into armed conflict, with rebels establishing a coalition. In early March, Gaddafi's forces pushed eastward and re-took several coastal cities before attacking Benghazi. On March 19th, French air force fighter planes entered Libyan airspace to begin reconnaissance missions, and flew over Benghazi to prevent any attacks on the rebel-controlled city.  The Italian air force planes also began operations over Libya at that time.  In the late afternoon of the 19th, French jets attacked government armour southwest of Benghazi, destroying some tanks. US and British naval ships fired at least 114 Tomahawk cruise missiles at twenty Libyan air and ground defense systems. Three US B-52 stealth bombers reportedly flew non-stop from the United States to drop forty bombs on a major Libyan airfield. Twenty-five coalition ships, including three US submarines, began operating in the area. Coalition jets also carried out airstrikes against Libyan military installations and targets. On March 20, several storm shadow missiles were launched against Libyan targets by British jets and 19 US jets.  At least seventy vehicles were destroyed, and loyalist ground troops sustained multiple casualties.  Strikes also took place in Tripoli with a lot of the same results.  On 25 March, NATO announced that it would be taking over the command of the no-fly-zone operations, after several days of heated debate over who should control operations in Libya. Almost everyday since, Coalition missles have been fired in the double digits daily and several other air strikes have been coinciding.
           April 19, the the United Kingdom  announced that it was sending military advisors to Libya to help the rebels improve their organization and communications, but not to train or arm them. The British government also supplied the rebels with telecommunications equipment and body armor.  April 20, the US announced a $25 million aid package to the Libyan rebels, which consisted of fuel trucks and fuel bladders, ambulances, medical equipment, protective vests, binoculars, food, and non-secure radios with the first shipment arriving May 10th. Qatar supplied Milan anti-tank missiles, pickup trucks, and uniforms to the rebels. The Libyan government claimed that Qatar also sent 20 military trainers to Benghazi to train over 700 rebel fighters. Also, the US has asked Saudi Arabia if it can supply weapons to the rebels in Benghazi. Their assistance would allow Washington to disclaim any military involvement in the supply chain even though the arms would be American and paid for by the Saudis. Saudi remains the only US Arab ally strategically placed and capable of furnishing weapons to the rebels of Libya.
              President Obama predicts the Libyan leader would be forced to step down if NATO keeps up its military campaign with the U.S. playing a key role. Speaking at a news conference in London, Obama says the U.S.-led NATO coalition is engaged in "a slow, steady process in which we're able to wear down the regime forces." Obama also said, "I believe that we have built enough momentum that as long as we sustain the course we're on, he will step down."  Later Obama not only called for more economic assistance for the movement during his meeting with European leaders but also expressed support for the efforts to kill dictator Qaddafi, a far departure from the original humanitarian aims expressed by the president earlier. Obama’s plan is to provide huge financial support for the new government taking shape in the region and now a deepening commitment to the eastern tribes in Libya’s civil war. Also part of his plan, Operation Libya is part of the broader military agenda in the Middle East and Central Asia which consists in gaining control and corporate ownership over more than sixty percent of the world's reserves of oil and natural gas, including oil and gas pipeline routes. At the end of the day one thing is clear, oil is the trophy of US-NATO led war.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Latest in Libyan War

Playing a softer tune
       It seems these days the effort in Libya isn't worth the trouble once thought by the United States, France, Italy, even Britian and other Eruopean countries.  The past talk of running Gaddafi from power was one of the upmost important tasks of the war with Libya with the US suppling weapons and other supplies to the rebels to insure the goal. President Obama, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy insisted, in a joint letter in April, that Gaddafi must give up power immediately and only after he stepped down could a genuine transition from dictatorship begin. Any other path would be a "unconscionable betrayal" of Libyans.
 Now, for some reason,the tone has changed somewhat. A "step down" in power is still the goal, yet it just doesn't have to be done as quickly now. The reason for postponement?  One source explians it's due to a new agreement with Gaddafigovernement troops were lifted. Another states that Gaddafi has been injured and is in no condition to travel.  Perhaps it's that the settlement of the current Libyan war would lower oil value and then prices. Whatever the reason, better get a close eye on what's happening in Libya.

Saturday, May 21, 2011

War is good for Business

Libya is targeted because it is one among several remaining countries outside America's sphere of influence, which fail to conform to US demands.  The objective of the US-NATO interference is strategic. It includes,as almost always it does, in the outright theft of stealing the nation's oil wealth under the disguise of a humanitarian intervention.     
Washington's design is to weaken the political links of several countries, including Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, to France and push for the installation of new political regimes which have a close rapport with the US. This weakening of France is part of a U.S. imperial design.  Basically what could happen is a redrawing of the map of Africa and the scrapping of the demarcations of the 1884 Berlin Conference.  Chad is potentially an oil rich economy as well. ExxonMobil and Chevron have interests in Southern Chad including a pipeline project. Southern Chad is a gateway into the Darfur region of Sudan, which is also strategic in view of its oil wealth.
An invasion of Libya under a humanitarian mandate would serve the same overall interests as the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq. The hidden objective is to take possession of Libya's oil reserves,  eventually privatize the country's oil industry, and transfer the control and ownership of Libya's oil wealth into foreign hands. Libya is merely just a piece to a puzzle.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

February 15th 2011(War on Libya) part 1

WHY A WAR ON LIBYA?
     Oil
 Much of the country's income comes from its production in oil.  Libya is the 18th largest oil producer and has the 9th largest oil reserve in the world and produces around 5- 7% of the worlds oil.  The United States alone buys roughly around 90,000 barrels a day from Libya,  and uses over 20 million barrels a day.  Since the start of the war in Libya oil prices have been at their highest since 2008 and the cost per barrel has gone up at least $20.  This past March, ABC news reported the highest month ever in gas prices they steadily rose for over a weeks span. 


Who benefiets from high oil prices? 
                   One of the world's largest proven oil reserves, Iraq is from oil prices that have soared above $100. The International Monetary Fund estimates that higher oil revenues will help Iraq's economy grow 11.5% in 2011. Iraq's stock market surged over 25% in the first three months of this year. 
               Exxon Mobil and Shell reported significantly larger first-quarter profits due, in great deal, from high oil prices and strong refining margins.  Gas prices have reached over a 35% rise since last year(2010).  On top of that, many oil companies have received tremendous tax breaks.
Exxon recently reported a 69% increase in profits this year and Shell a 22%.  Shell stations have bought out all the BP stations in my area and remodeled most of them as prices countinue to rise.  Mining stocks and chemical companies tend to do well when oil prices have been rising. Hi-tech companies also fare better than most companies as well.  I will tell you who isn't benefieting from the high oil prices, it's the american people and the regular citizens of the world.   We do not have our greedy fingers strring the oil fields.  We will look more into this as we get more in-depth into the causes and effects of the recent Lybian war.  Look for the next post to look more into this subject.